JUST IN: Senate Passes SB 5855, Formally Barring Law Enforcement Officers From Wearing Face Coverings While on Duty despite Donald Trump’s Objection

In a party-line vote, the Washington State Senate approved **Senate Bill 5855** on Wednesday, prohibiting most law enforcement officers — including local, state, and federal agents such as those from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — from wearing opaque face coverings while interacting with the public.

The measure, sponsored by Sen. Javier Valdez (D-Seattle), passed 30-19 with Democrats in favor and all Republicans opposed. It strengthens existing state law requiring officers to be reasonably identifiable and bans items like balaclavas, tactical masks, gaiters, and ski masks that conceal facial identity.

Exceptions include undercover operations, SWAT team protective gear, clear or translucent face shields, medical masks for health protection, respirators in hazardous conditions, and helmets for transportation.

Supporters argue the bill promotes transparency and accountability, particularly amid concerns over masked federal immigration agents and recent high-profile incidents involving ICE. “In the United States, federal agents are roaming around with masks.

We just can’t get used to that,” Gov. Bob Ferguson stated in support, urging swift action to send the bill to his desk for signature.

The legislation would allow individuals detained by an officer violating the rule to sue for damages, including compensatory and punitive awards, costs, and attorneys’ fees.

Critics, including Republican senators, raised concerns about officer safety and potential conflicts with federal authority.

President Donald Trump publicly objected to the bill, calling it an interference with federal law enforcement operations and agent protections against harassment or doxxing.

The bill now heads to the House for consideration, though it may not advance until after the February 17 house-of-origin cutoff.

Legal challenges are anticipated if it becomes law, given questions over state authority to regulate federal officers.

This development reflects ongoing national debates about law enforcement transparency, public safety, and immigration enforcement tactics.