Unbelievable: Kanye West has sparked controversy once again with a series of erratic and explicit tweets that involve Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber, and Harry Styles….. Continue Reading 👇

Warner Bros. is hitting back and asking a New York judge to completely reject a subpoena from Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ legal team that is demanding unedited interviews featuring two individuals who appeared in the The Fall of Diddy.

The disgraced music mogul’s defense also wants any notes or journals sent to producers of the Investigation Discovery series which kicked off on January 27, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Combs – who is currently behind bars on federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges – will soon begin his trial in May 2025, with jury selection on May 5.

However, on Tuesday, April 8, attorneys for Warner Bros asked federal Judge Arun Subramanian, to quash Combs’ subpoena, citing “reporter’s privilege” as the legal justification for not handing off the material to the rapper’s team.

Thomas Sullivan, lawyer for the production company, wrote: “Mr. Combs seeks outtakes from interviews with two persons featured in the docuseries. The interview outtakes it seeks are protected by the reporter’s privilege that applies to unpublished newsgathering materials.”

Reporter’s privilege is set to protect journalists from being ordered by the court to reveal confidential sources or information.

“Mr. Combs has not met, and cannot meet, his burden to overcome that privilege,” Sullivan added.

One of the individuals who appeared in the footage Combs’ team wants eyes on is chef who worked for the Bad Boy Records founder, while the other is one of his ex-girlfriends; they are referred to as Individual A and Individual B.

Sullivan wrote Individual A “is featured in the docuseries speaking about how Mr. Combs treated her when she was employed by him, as well as about various rumors she heard about his behavior during her time in his orbit.”

Meanwhile, “Individual B is a former romantic partner of Mr. Combs. She is featured in the docuseries discussing the origins and path of her relationship with him, including one alleged incident of sexual assault.”

Sullivan added: “Courts have consistently held that broad subpoenas for journalistic outtakes based on the hope that the unpublished material might prove relevant in some way are insufficient to overcome the reporter’s privilege.”